GOAL: How do we improve special education student’s performance
on district wide Texas History assessments?
|
OUTCOMES
|
ACTIVITIES
|
RESOURCES/ RESEARCH TOOLS NEEDED
|
RESPONSIBILITY TO ADDRESS ACTIVITIES
|
TIME LINE
|
Benchmarks/
ASSESSMENT
|
Revisions to SIP/PIP based on monitoring and assessments
|
Find special education students that struggle on Texas
History district wide assessments.
|
Study previous assessment data to find students to
target.
|
Raw assessment data gathered through school net.
|
Thurman Brown
|
March 17, 2012
|
Six weeks district assessments from the current school
year.
|
Possibly look at performance on classroom assessments
not created by the district, but by the teacher.
|
Select ten students to participate in action research.
|
Select ten students from my list of special education
students that struggle on district assessments.
|
School net assessment data.
|
Thurman Brown
|
March 18, 2012
|
I will choose students based on failing two or more
district assessments.
|
Possible adjustment of the number of students used
depending on parental consent.
|
Get consent of parents and students to participate in
tutorials.
|
Ask parental permission for students to attend tutorials
and notify them of the days that tutorials will be held.
|
Parents/Students, parent contact information.
|
Thurman Brown
|
March 18, 2012
|
Explain student performance on previous assessments to
parents in order to gain consent for their child to participate in mandatory
tutorials.
|
Choose other students based on parental response.
|
Teacher assesses where students need help the most.
|
Students are given a pretest to assess their areas of
weakness.
|
Computer, assessment created based on the TEKS.
|
Thurman Brown
|
March 19, 2012
|
Assessment given to get a starting point for tutorials.
|
Modify the test based on the students selected.
|
Students are present and ready to receive extra help.
|
Begin tutorials.
|
Textbook, previous district assessments.
|
Thurman Brown
|
March 22, 2012
|
Verbally assess if students are grasping the concepts.
|
Ask the students what will help them to succeed.
|
Students show progress from the starting point.
|
Assess student progress.
|
Computer, assessment created based on the TEKS.
|
Thurman Brown
|
April 6 , 2012
|
Students’ scores have improved since the pretest.
|
Adjust strategies used based on assessment.
|
Students feel more prepared and confident in their
ability to pass the assessment.
|
Administer six weeks district assessment.
|
District assessment.
|
Thurman Brown
|
April 13, 2012
|
District six weeks assessment.
|
Monitor students while completing the test to see if
they seem confident in answering questions.
|
Students’ performance has improved since the last
assessment.
|
Disaggregate data from assessment.
|
Computer, school net,
|
Thurman Brown
|
April 14, 2012
|
Identified students’ scores have improved from the last
assessment.
|
Evaluate questions missed by sample group to judge the
quality and clarity of questions.
|
Continue to work with students on improving test scores.
|
Mandatory tutorials
|
Textbook, review materials.
|
Thurman Brown
|
April 16,2012
|
Students can complete review material with at least 70%
accuracy.
|
Increase the number of morning tutorials based on the
needs and performance of the students.
|
All sped students involved in this research will pass
the district semester exam.
|
Administer semester exam
|
Semester exam.
|
Thurman Brown
|
May 29, 2012- June 1, 2012
|
District semester exam.
|
Decrease the passing rate to 90%.
|
Students’ scores have improved.
|
Disaggregate data from semester exam.
|
Computer, school net.
|
Thurman Brown
|
June 1, 2012
|
All identified students have improved from the initial
assessment.
|
Depending on passing rate present findings to principal
for school wide implementation.
|